W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ws-policy@w3.org > January 2008

Re: [Bug 5346] Operation parameter in bindingOperation is of type QName

From: Christopher B Ferris <chrisfer@us.ibm.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2008 15:14:30 -0500
To: Paul Cotton <Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com>
Cc: "public-ws-policy@w3.org" <public-ws-policy@w3.org>, public-ws-policy-request@w3.org, "tvanlessen@taval.de" <tvanlessen@taval.de>
Message-ID: <OF60721293.533F74EF-ON852573CC.006EE5F0-852573CC.006F02C8@us.ibm.com>
+1

Christopher Ferris
STSM, Software Group Standards Strategy
email: chrisfer@us.ibm.com
blog: http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/blogs/page/chrisferris
phone: +1 508 234 2986

public-ws-policy-request@w3.org wrote on 01/09/2008 01:34:19 PM:

> 
> We have received the following public comment on the WSDL 1.1 
> Element Identifiers WG Note [2].
> 
> Note that the comment actually refers to [1] which is an Editor's 
> CVS version of the spec.  But I believe the comment applies to the 
> published WG Note at [2].
> 
> > I'm wondering whether the second parameter ('operation') in 
> operation binding references should be really a QName. Shouldn't it 
> be a NCName?
> > The examples are also referring to NCName, like http://...#wsdl11.
> bindingOperation(TicketAgentSoap/listFlights)
> 
> Here is my initial reaction:
> 
> Table 2-1. "Rules for determining pointer parts for WSDL 1.1 
> elements" [3] in the WSDL 1.1 Element Identifiers WG Note [2] and 
> the type of the second parameter is based on Table A-1. "Rules for 
> determining pointer parts for WSDL 2.0 components" from WSDL 2.0 [4].
> 
> In particular the WSDL 2.0 table [4] defines the operation parameter
> for the binding references (e.g Binding Fault, Binding Operation, 
> Binding Message Reference, and Binding Fault Reference) as QName. 
> Since our table is based on the WSDL 2.0 table, I believe that we 
> defined the second parameter's type as QNAME to match what was done 
> in the WSDL 2.0 table [4].
> 
> If the commenter is correct then I believe this matter needs to be 
> first taken up as a comment on the WSDL 2.0 specification.
> 
> Comments.
> 
> /paulc
> 
> [1] http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/%7Echeckout%
> 7E/2006/ws/policy/wsdl11elementidentifiers.html?content-
> type=text/html;%20charset=utf-8#frag-ids
> [2] http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/NOTE-wsdl11elementidentifiers-20070720/
> [3] 
http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/NOTE-wsdl11elementidentifiers-20070720/#frag-ids
> [4] http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/REC-wsdl20-20070626/#frag-ids
> 
> Paul Cotton, Microsoft Canada
> 17 Eleanor Drive, Ottawa, Ontario K2E 6A3
> Tel: (425) 705-9596 Fax: (425) 936-7329
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: public-ws-policy-qa-request@w3.org [mailto:public-ws-policy-
> qa-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
> Sent: Friday, January 04, 2008 10:55 AM
> To: public-ws-policy-qa@w3.org
> Subject: [Bug 5346] Operation parameter in bindingOperation is of type 
QName
> 
> 
> http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=5346
> 
>            Summary: Operation parameter in bindingOperation is of type 
QName
>            Product: WS-Policy
>            Version: PR
>           Platform: PC
>                URL: 
http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/%7Echeckout%7E/2006/ws/policy/w
>                     sdl11elementidentifiers.html?content-
>                     type=text/html;%20charset=utf-8#frag-ids
>         OS/Version: Windows XP
>             Status: NEW
>           Severity: normal
>           Priority: P2
>          Component: WSDL1.1-Element-Identifiers
>         AssignedTo: fsasaki@w3.org
>         ReportedBy: tvanlessen@taval.de
>          QAContact: public-ws-policy-qa@w3.org
> 
> 
> I'm wondering whether the second parameter ('operation') in operation 
binding
> references should be really a QName. Shouldn't it be a NCName?
> 
> The examples are also referring to NCName, like
> http://...#wsdl11.bindingOperation(TicketAgentSoap/listFlights)
> 
> 
Received on Thursday, 10 January 2008 20:14:52 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 10 January 2008 20:14:52 GMT