W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ws-policy@w3.org > September 2007

Re: AI 339

From: Felix Sasaki <fsasaki@w3.org>
Date: Wed, 12 Sep 2007 14:49:57 +0900
Message-ID: <46E77E05.4080702@w3.org>
To: Maryann Hondo <mhondo@us.ibm.com>
CC: "public-ws-policy@w3.org" <public-ws-policy@w3.org>

Hi Maryann,

some minor change proposals:

1)
"Assertion authors should specify the semantics of multiple instances of 
same policy assertion type in the same policy alternative and the 
semantics of parameters and nested policy (if any) when there are 
multiple instances of a policy assertion type in the same policy 
alternative regardless of the mechanism used to attach them to a policy 
subject."
add a sentence:
"If there are multiple instances of a policy assertion type in the same 
policy alternative without parameters and nested policies, these have 
the same meaning as a single assertion of the type within the policy 
alternative."
(to take sec. 3.2 of the framework into account)

2)
"Assertion Authors that utilize WSDL policy subjects need to understand 
how the assertions will be processed in merging and the specify 
implications of a result where multiple assertions of the assertion type 
in an alternative, in the merged policy. "
to
"Assertion Authors that utilize WSDL policy subjects need to understand 
how the assertions will be processed in merging and the specific 
implications of a result where multiple assertions of the assertion type 
are in an alternative, in the merged policy."

Felix


Maryann Hondo wrote:
>
> This is the current proposed strawman for section 5.7 of the 
> Guidelines document and a diff to the current
> working draft at [ 
> http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/%7Echeckout%7E/2006/ws/policy/ws-policy-guidelines.html?content-type=text/html;%20charset=utf-8 
> ]
>
>
> Maryann
>
>
>
>
Received on Wednesday, 12 September 2007 05:50:07 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:20:53 GMT