Hi Maryann This ammendment is better/clearer than the text I proposed, thanks a lot. +1 to updating the Ignorable section in the primer as suggested in your ammendment Cheers, Sergey ----- Original Message ----- From: Maryann Hondo To: Sergey Beryozkin Cc: public-ws-policy@w3.org Sent: Tuesday, March 13, 2007 2:13 AM Subject: friendly ammendment to 4339 Sergey in response to the bug you filed: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=4339 would you consider a friendly ammendment? Target: WS-Policy Primer Sergey's Proposal : Update the last sentence : "Please note that the ignorableness is at the discretion of policy consumers therefore ignorable assertions may have an impact on determining compatibility of policies" Proposed Friendly Ammendment: "Please note that the impact of the ignorable attribute is at the discretion of policy consumers (through selection of "lax" or "strict" mode) therefore ignorable assertions may have an effect on determining compatibility of policies"Received on Tuesday, 13 March 2007 14:41:02 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:20:48 GMT