Re: friendly ammendment to 4339

Hi Maryann

This ammendment is better/clearer than the text I proposed, thanks a lot.
+1 to updating the Ignorable section in the primer as suggested in your ammendment

Cheers, Sergey
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: Maryann Hondo 
  To: Sergey Beryozkin 
  Cc: public-ws-policy@w3.org 
  Sent: Tuesday, March 13, 2007 2:13 AM
  Subject: friendly ammendment to 4339



  Sergey in response to the bug you filed: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=4339 
  would you consider a friendly ammendment? 
    
  Target: WS-Policy Primer 
    

  Sergey's Proposal : Update the last sentence : "Please note that the ignorableness is at the discretion of policy consumers therefore ignorable assertions may have an
  impact on determining compatibility of policies"


  Proposed Friendly Ammendment: 
    
  "Please note that the impact of the ignorable attribute is at
  the discretion of policy consumers (through selection of "lax" or "strict" mode)  therefore ignorable assertions may have an effect on determining compatibility of policies"

Received on Tuesday, 13 March 2007 14:41:02 UTC