W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ws-policy@w3.org > March 2007

RE: Testcases for External Attachment WSDL 1.1 and 2.0

From: Asir Vedamuthu <asirveda@microsoft.com>
Date: Tue, 6 Mar 2007 17:42:09 -0800
To: Ashok Malhotra <ashok.malhotra@oracle.com>, "public-ws-policy@w3.org" <public-ws-policy@w3.org>
Message-ID: <C9BF0238EED3634BA1866AEF14C7A9E534E57D8438@NA-EXMSG-C116.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>

Few follow up questions/comments:

a) Shouldn't there be two expected results (one for Test case 1 and another for Test case 2) in both these documents?

b) In the WSDL 20 test case, the input WSDL document has a PolicyReference element (<wsp:PolicyReference URI="#A12Endpoint). Is that intentional?

c) Typos in WSDL 20 test cases - s/#wsdlBindingMessageReference/#wsdl.bindingMessageReference/g

d) Typos in WSDL 11 test cases -
s/#wsdl11.binding.input/#wsdl11.bindingOperation.input/g
s/#wsdl11.binding.output/#wsdl11.bindingOperation.output/g

Regards,

Asir S Vedamuthu
Microsoft Corporation


-----Original Message-----
From: public-ws-policy-request@w3.org [mailto:public-ws-policy-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Ashok Malhotra
Sent: Friday, March 02, 2007 12:48 PM
To: public-ws-policy@w3.org
Subject: Testcases for External Attachment WSDL 1.1 and 2.0

I have made the changes that Asir suggested.  Please take a look.



All the best, Ashok
Received on Wednesday, 7 March 2007 01:43:43 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:20:48 GMT