W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ws-policy@w3.org > January 2007

RE: Bug 4270: Primer versioning example

From: Asir Vedamuthu <asirveda@microsoft.com>
Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2007 16:31:07 -0800
To: David Orchard <dorchard@bea.com>, "public-ws-policy@w3.org" <public-ws-policy@w3.org>
Message-ID: <C9BF0238EED3634BA1866AEF14C7A9E53469FB6AE3@NA-EXMSG-C116.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>

Thank you for updating the proposal.

At the recent F2F, WG discussed the idea of adding a health warning to the EndOfLife assertion example (just as other hypothetical constructs in the Primer). Concretely, this is a minor editorial change:

s/The example below shows Contoso version 2 policy expression with ignorable EndOfLife Assertion/The example below shows Contoso version 2 policy expression with a hypothetical ignorable EndOfLife Assertion/.

Regards,

Asir S Vedamuthu
Microsoft Corporation


-----Original Message-----
From: public-ws-policy-request@w3.org [mailto:public-ws-policy-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of David Orchard
Sent: Monday, January 22, 2007 6:43 PM
To: public-ws-policy@w3.org
Subject: Bug 4270: Primer versioning example


I created the bug and updated the example to explain the advantages of
having the EOL assertion in the very first alternative as well as the
trade-off between lax and strict.

http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=4270

Cheers,
Dave
Received on Wednesday, 31 January 2007 00:31:22 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:20:45 GMT