W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ws-policy@w3.org > January 2007

RE: [Bug 4211] WSDL WG Editorial comments on Attachment

From: Asir Vedamuthu <asirveda@microsoft.com>
Date: Sun, 14 Jan 2007 01:38:26 -0800
Message-ID: <1E0F0378382054439F14D5450650478F0BFD78DD@RED-MSG-42.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
To: Paul Cotton <Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com>, <public-ws-policy@w3.org>

This e-mail outlines proposed actions to resolve issue 4211.


>8. Effective Policy (3.1)

These editorial suggestions sound okay.

Action: adopt these editorial changes.


>9. XML Element Attachment (3.3)
>- Element Information Item should reference 
>its definition in XML Infoset

The first usage of 'element information item' is in Section 3.3 [1].
Suggested editorial change to resolve item 9:

s/The resultant policy is then associated with the element information
item's element policy property./The resultant policy is then associated
with the element information item's (as defined in [XML Information
Set]) element policy property./

[1]
http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/WD-ws-policy-attach-20061117/#XMLElementAttach
ement

Action: adopt the above editorial change.


>10. Security Considerations (7)
>- Policy attachments "signing" is RECOMMENDED 
>but there is no reference to what
>is indicated by "signing" or to any standards 
>work (W3C or other) around any
>such signing.

Attachment draft says that a more complete description of security
considerations is in the Framework draft. Section 5, Framework draft,
carries an explicit reference to WS-Security 1.0. I hope this helps.

Action: None


Regards,
 
Asir S Vedamuthu
Microsoft Corporation


-----Original Message-----
From: public-ws-policy-request@w3.org
[mailto:public-ws-policy-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Paul Cotton
Sent: Friday, January 12, 2007 4:10 PM
To: public-ws-policy@w3.org
Subject: [Bug 4211] WSDL WG Editorial comments on Attachment


-----Original Message-----
From: public-ws-policy-qa-request@w3.org
[mailto:public-ws-policy-qa-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of
bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org
Sent: January 12, 2007 6:58 PM
To: public-ws-policy-qa@w3.org
Subject: [Bug 4211] WSDL WG Editorial comments on Attachment


http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=4211

           Summary: WSDL WG Editorial comments on Attachment
           Product: WS-Policy
           Version: LC
          Platform: All
        OS/Version: All
            Status: NEW
          Severity: minor
          Priority: P2
         Component: Attachment
        AssignedTo: fsasaki@w3.org
        ReportedBy: jonathan@wso2.com
         QAContact: public-ws-policy-qa@w3.org


8. Effective Policy (3.1)
- The second paragraph is very cumbersome. The first phrase in the first
sentence should be broken out into its own sentence, to read, "When
multiple
attachments are made, their relevant policies can be combined."
- The third paragraph has the same problem. The first phrase in the
first
sentence should be broken out into its own sentence, to read, "This
combination
can be achieved through a merge."

9. XML Element Attachment (3.3)
- Element Information Item should reference its definition in XML
Infoset [3].

10. Security Considerations (7)
- Policy attachments "signing" is RECOMMENDED but there is no reference
to what
is indicated by "signing" or to any standards work (W3C or other) around
any
such signing. Does this refer to WSS signatures [6]? The use of
"signing"
itself in this language should reference any such standard(s).

[3]
http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/REC-xml-infoset-20040204/#infoitem.document
[6]
http://docs.oasis-open.org/wss/2004/01/oasis-200401-wss-soap-message-sec
urity-1.0.pdf
Received on Sunday, 14 January 2007 09:46:33 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:20:45 GMT