W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ws-policy@w3.org > February 2007

Re: Features at Risk

From: Felix Sasaki <fsasaki@w3.org>
Date: Thu, 08 Feb 2007 01:26:19 +0900
Message-ID: <45C9FDAB.6070507@w3.org>
To: Asir Vedamuthu <asirveda@microsoft.com>
Cc: "public-ws-policy@w3.org" <public-ws-policy@w3.org>

One correction:

s/requested the Working Group to consider/proposed the Working Group to
consider/

Regards, Felix.

Asir Vedamuthu wrote:
> To advance WS-Policy to Proposed Recommendation, the Working Group needs to show that each feature in the Framework and Attachment drafts has been implemented. Thus far, there aren't any publicly visible implementations for the following features:
> 
> a) Ignorable Policy Assertions
> b) External Policy Attachment
> c) Attaching Policies Using UDDI
> 
> For a successful Candidate Recommendation phase, we request the WG to consider marking features a)-c) as being at risk (the history is that most of the features marked as being at risk were implemented by multiple vendors).
> 
> Also, in Nov, W3C requested the Working Group to consider marking feature a) as being at risk [1].
> 
> [1] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-policy/2006Nov/0077.html
> 
> Regards,
> 
> Asir S Vedamuthu
> Microsoft Corporation
> 
> 
Received on Wednesday, 7 February 2007 16:26:31 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:20:47 GMT