W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ws-policy@w3.org > September 2006

RE: RE: Resolution to Issue 3617

From: Yalcinalp, Umit <umit.yalcinalp@sap.com>
Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 08:56:04 -0700
Message-ID: <2BA6015847F82645A9BB31C7F9D64165023979CE@uspale20.pal.sap.corp>
To: "Paul Cotton" <Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com>, <public-ws-policy@w3.org>

Not quite. The RESOLUTION marker is a bit dangling and does not
illustrate this. As a person who was not in the meeting, it was not
clear to me what the final resolution was as there was a lot of
discussion. 

Thanks for the clarification. Maybe it should be clearly marked in the
minutes. 

--umit
 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Paul Cotton [mailto:Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com] 
> Sent: Wednesday, Sep 27, 2006 6:48 AM
> To: Yalcinalp, Umit; public-ws-policy@w3.org
> Subject: RE: RE: Resolution to Issue 3617
> 
> Actually I thought the minutes were fairly clear here since 
> they outlined exactly the changes to be made:
> 
> 
> <PaulC> Re bullet 1: No change is necessary
> 
> <asir> Related editorial action is 
> http://www.w3.org/2005/06/tracker/wspolicyeds/actions/23
> 
> <PaulC> Re bullet 2: change "preponderence" to "vast majority"
> 
> <PaulC> Re bullet 3: s/cardinality of elements/cardinality of 
> elements (i.e.
> 
> <PaulC> modifications to minOccurs or maxOccurs attribute 
> value of an element
> 
> <PaulC> declaration)/.
> 
> 
> BTW I have already marked this issue as FIXED in Bugzilla.
> 
> /paulc
> ________________________________
> From: public-ws-policy-request@w3.org On Behalf Of Yalcinalp, Umit
> Sent: September 26, 2006 9:02 PM
> To: public-ws-policy@w3.org
> Subject: RE: Resolution to Issue 3617
> 
> 
> 
> Apologies. Forgot to add the pointer to the minutes where the 
> issue was discussed [1].
> 
> --umit
> 
> 
> [1] http://www.w3.org/2006/09/13-ws-policy-minutes.html
> 
> ___________________________  __________________
> From:   Yalcinalp, Umit
> Sent:   Tuesday, Sep 26, 2006 5:58 PM
> To:     public-ws-policy@w3.org
> Subject:        Resolution to Issue 3617
> 
> 
> Folks,
> 
> I was reading the minutes. I am sure approval of the minutes 
> of the f2f will come up tomorrow. I really can not follow the 
> conclusion and the resolution of the namespace policy. If I 
> do not understand it as the issue owner, I can not really 
> close it. ;-)
> 
> Could we review the outcome? Probably the minutes need to be 
> updated to reflect the reality better as well.
> 
> Thanks.
> 
> --umit
> 
> ----------------------
> 
> Dr. Umit Yalcinalp
> Architect
> NetWeaver Industry Standards
> SAP Labs, LLC
> Email: umit.yalcinalp@sap.com Tel: (650) 320-3095
> SDN: https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/sdn/weblogs?blog=/pub/u/36238
> --------
> "First they ignore you, then they ridicule you,
> then they fight you, then you win." Gandhi
> 
Received on Wednesday, 27 September 2006 15:53:26 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:20:41 GMT