W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ws-policy@w3.org > August 2006

Issue 3619 - input from WS-Addressing WG

From: Paul Cotton <Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com>
Date: Wed, 30 Aug 2006 13:51:54 -0700
To: "public-ws-policy@w3.org" <public-ws-policy@w3.org>
CC: Maryann Hondo <mhondo@us.ibm.com>, "Marc.Hadley@Sun.COM" <Marc.Hadley@Sun.COM>, Bob Freund-Hitachi <bob.freund@hitachisoftware.com>
Message-ID: <4D66CCFC0B64BA4BBD79D55F6EBC22570ED21BBB58@NA-EXMSG-C103.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>

Add an issue on coordination with other working groups
http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=3619

Maryann carried out her action to ask the WS-Addressing WG to review the example in Section 3.4 of WS-PolicyAttachments:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-addressing/2006Aug/0087.html

We need to consider the questions asked by Marc Hadley in his response to Maryann's request:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-addressing/2006Aug/0089.html

"Have you considered the semantics when other things are included in
the EndpointReference. In particular, if the EPR contains a metadata
element with an embedded wsp:Policy (either directly or via an
intermediate embedded or referenced WSDL), how are the policies
reconciled?"

WG members are encouraged to reply to this thread to help the WG to reach consensus on how to reply to Marc's question.

/paulc

Paul Cotton, Microsoft Canada
17 Eleanor Drive, Ottawa, Ontario K2E 6A3
Tel: (613) 225-5445 Fax: (425) 936-7329
mailto:Paul.Cotton@microsoft.com
Received on Wednesday, 30 August 2006 20:53:08 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:20:40 GMT