W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ws-policy-eds@w3.org > May 2007

RE: Problem generating WS-Policy Framework HTML

From: Prasad Yendluri <prasad.yendluri@webmethods.com>
Date: Tue, 29 May 2007 13:56:39 -0700
Message-ID: <497B3BF095D687408EC268A103E85E857FFDAE@ca-exbe1.webm.webmethods.com>
To: "WS-Policy Editors W3C" <public-ws-policy-eds@w3.org>
The following seems to be the problem.

Does anyone have a clue?

 

     [java] Warning: org.xml.sax.SAXParseException: Using original
entity definition for "&quot;".

     [java] Internal loc href to #policy_alternative_vocabulary, but
that ID does not exist in this document.

     [java] Processing terminated by xsl:message at line 1437 in
xmlspec.xsl

     [java] Java Result: 1

 

________________________________

From: public-ws-policy-eds-request@w3.org
[mailto:public-ws-policy-eds-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Prasad
Yendluri
Sent: Tuesday, May 29, 2007 1:36 PM
To: WS-Policy Editors W3C
Subject: RE: Problem generating WS-Policy Framework HTML

 

Just to be clear, something went wrong in the last few check-ins.

Not with what I was trying to add. We cannot generate proper HTML

with the currently checked in ws-policy-framework.xml file.

 

________________________________

From: public-ws-policy-eds-request@w3.org
[mailto:public-ws-policy-eds-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Prasad
Yendluri
Sent: Tuesday, May 29, 2007 1:19 PM
To: WS-Policy Editors W3C
Subject: Problem generating WS-Policy Framework HTML
Importance: High

 

Folks,

 

I was trying to make my editorial changes from the F2F to the WS-Policy
Framework document and I just realized, 

the HTML WS-Policy Framework document generated gets truncated in the
middle of section 2.4 (Terminology).

 

I have reproduced below the entire section 2.4 as generated. 

I am unable to proceed with my AIs until this is fixed.

I am checking what went wrong but, if anyone else has any ideas please
let me know.

 

Regards,

Prasad

 


2.4 Terminology


The keywords "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
"SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this
document are to be interpreted as described in RFC 2119 [IETF RFC 2119
<file:///C:\Eclipse-3.1.2\WTP\eclipse\workspace\policy\ws-policy-framewo
rk.html#RFC2119#RFC2119> ]. 

We introduce the following terms that are used throughout this document:

ignorable policy assertion
<file:///C:\Eclipse-3.1.2\WTP\eclipse\workspace\policy\ws-policy-framewo
rk.html#ignorable_policy_assertion#ignorable_policy_assertion>  

An ignorable policy assertion is an assertion that may be ignored for
policy intersection (as defined in 4.5 Policy Intersection
<http://www.w3.org/TR/ws-policy#Policy_Intersection> ).

nested policy expression
<file:///C:\Eclipse-3.1.2\WTP\eclipse\workspace\policy\ws-policy-framewo
rk.html#nested_policy_expression#nested_policy_expression>  

A nested policy expression is a <a title="

 
Received on Tuesday, 29 May 2007 20:56:51 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:21:03 GMT