W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ws-policy-eds@w3.org > May 2007

RE: [SPAM] RE: [SPAM] RE: WS-Policy Primer Editors draft & diff to be sent to WG tomorrow

From: David Orchard <dorchard@bea.com>
Date: Mon, 7 May 2007 15:48:23 -0700
Message-ID: <4260A18CD3F05B469E67BC6C20464EAC0627F0@rcpbex01.amer.bea.com>
To: "Prasad Yendluri" <prasad.yendluri@webmethods.com>, <public-ws-policy-eds@w3.org>
Sure.  


________________________________

	From: Prasad Yendluri [mailto:prasad.yendluri@webmethods.com] 
	Sent: Monday, May 07, 2007 4:46 PM
	To: David Orchard; public-ws-policy-eds@w3.org
	Subject: RE: [SPAM] RE: [SPAM] RE: WS-Policy Primer Editors
draft & diff to be sent to WG tomorrow
	
	

	Well in that case I ask that you send an explicit note by 3pm
tomorrow if all is clear from your side or not. 

	We did not know there was a dependency on Monica on this.

	 

	
________________________________


	From: David Orchard [mailto:dorchard@bea.com] 
	Sent: Monday, May 07, 2007 3:41 PM
	To: Prasad Yendluri; public-ws-policy-eds@w3.org
	Subject: [SPAM] RE: [SPAM] RE: WS-Policy Primer Editors draft &
diff to be sent to WG tomorrow

	 

	Well, I didn't know there was an issue.  I think it reasonable
to give her a day to clarify before publishing.  I suggest that you
publish as scheduled unless I've heard something that requires action.

	 

	Cheers,

	Dave

		 

		
________________________________


		From: Prasad Yendluri
[mailto:prasad.yendluri@webmethods.com] 
		Sent: Monday, May 07, 2007 4:37 PM
		To: David Orchard; public-ws-policy-eds@w3.org
		Subject: RE: [SPAM] RE: WS-Policy Primer Editors draft &
diff to be sent to WG tomorrow

		My understanding was we were ready to go and I was
trying to do this as the reporter for the next call.

		It seems Asir had the same understanding, after speaking
with you yesterday. Had we known there was 

		an issue we could have saved ourselves some time on the
diff generation and tagging things. 

		 

		I don't know if Monica is reviewing editors' drafts in
flight, when she would send her feedback or 

		 how we will incorporate that directly without going
through the usual process of the WG 

		but, I will not send it out tomorrow. 

		 

		 

		
________________________________


		From: David Orchard [mailto:dorchard@bea.com] 
		Sent: Monday, May 07, 2007 3:14 PM
		To: Prasad Yendluri; public-ws-policy-eds@w3.org
		Subject: [SPAM] RE: WS-Policy Primer Editors draft &
diff to be sent to WG tomorrow

		 

		Fabian and Monica may have a concern about the new table
in 3.8.4.  I've asked for clarification.  We should hold off until this
is is resolved.

		 

		Cheers,

		Dave

			 

			
________________________________


			From: public-ws-policy-eds-request@w3.org
[mailto:public-ws-policy-eds-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Prasad
Yendluri
			Sent: Monday, May 07, 2007 4:07 PM
			To: public-ws-policy-eds@w3.org
			Subject: WS-Policy Primer Editors draft & diff
to be sent to WG tomorrow

			Folks,

			 

			The next editors' draft of Primer and the
corresponding diff file are ready to be sent to the WG.

			I am sending this to the editors' list for a
sanity check prior to sending this to the WG list. 

			Please find the drafts here:

			 

			[1] Primer at: http://tinyurl.com/2h9hlq 

			[2] Primer diff at: http://tinyurl.com/yu5o4s 

			 

			The diffs account for changes since the last
primer version sent to WG (March 30, '07).

			Please let me know if you find any show
stoppers.

			I plan to send this to the WG tomorrow after 3pm
pacific if I do not hear otherwise.

			 

			Regards,

			Prasad

			 
Received on Monday, 7 May 2007 22:48:43 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:21:03 GMT