Re: WSDL 1.1 element identifiers

David Orchard wrote:
> Yes..
> 
> The problem is that we have to use the WSDL 2.0 xmlspec because it has
> support for <emph> inside <code>, which is in the table of identifiers.
> The WG wanted the table to look like the WSDL 2.0 table.

I solved the problem, but did not commit yet. I used markup like this:
<td><code>wsdl11.types(</code><code
role="code-emph">types</code><code>)</code></td>
and munged the xslt to produce HTML like this:
<code style="font-style: italic;">types</code>
You can see the look at
http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/policy/7/01/wsdl11-elementidentifier/ (not
finished for publication yet, only member-visible.)

Felix

Regards, Felix.

> 
> Thanks,
> Dave
> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Philippe Le Hegaret [mailto:plh@w3.org] 
>> Sent: Tuesday, January 23, 2007 7:15 AM
>> To: David Orchard
>> Subject: WSDL 1.1 element identifiers
>>
>> David,
>>
>> a long time ago, you mentioned troubles with xmlspec and the 
>> WSDL 1.1 element identifiers. I promised to look into that 
>> and never did. Do you still have them?
>>
>> Philippe
>>
>>
>>
>