- From: Felix Sasaki <fsasaki@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2007 01:39:00 +0900
- To: David Orchard <dorchard@bea.com>
- Cc: Philippe Le Hegaret <plh@w3.org>, public-ws-policy-eds@w3.org
David Orchard wrote: > Yes.. > > The problem is that we have to use the WSDL 2.0 xmlspec because it has > support for <emph> inside <code>, which is in the table of identifiers. > The WG wanted the table to look like the WSDL 2.0 table. I solved the problem, but did not commit yet. I used markup like this: <td><code>wsdl11.types(</code><code role="code-emph">types</code><code>)</code></td> and munged the xslt to produce HTML like this: <code style="font-style: italic;">types</code> You can see the look at http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/policy/7/01/wsdl11-elementidentifier/ (not finished for publication yet, only member-visible.) Felix Regards, Felix. > > Thanks, > Dave > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Philippe Le Hegaret [mailto:plh@w3.org] >> Sent: Tuesday, January 23, 2007 7:15 AM >> To: David Orchard >> Subject: WSDL 1.1 element identifiers >> >> David, >> >> a long time ago, you mentioned troubles with xmlspec and the >> WSDL 1.1 element identifiers. I promised to look into that >> and never did. Do you still have them? >> >> Philippe >> >> >> >
Received on Tuesday, 23 January 2007 16:39:13 UTC