Yes.. The problem is that we have to use the WSDL 2.0 xmlspec because it has support for <emph> inside <code>, which is in the table of identifiers. The WG wanted the table to look like the WSDL 2.0 table. Thanks, Dave > -----Original Message----- > From: Philippe Le Hegaret [mailto:plh@w3.org] > Sent: Tuesday, January 23, 2007 7:15 AM > To: David Orchard > Subject: WSDL 1.1 element identifiers > > David, > > a long time ago, you mentioned troubles with xmlspec and the > WSDL 1.1 element identifiers. I promised to look into that > and never did. Do you still have them? > > Philippe > > >Received on Tuesday, 23 January 2007 16:34:41 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:21:00 GMT