W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ws-desc-comments@w3.org > March 2006

RE: wsdl20-adjuncts vs RFC 4288

From: Jonathan Marsh <jmarsh@microsoft.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2006 15:05:09 -0800
Message-ID: <37D0366A39A9044286B2783EB4C3C4E801F2168F@RED-MSG-10.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
To: "Bjoern Hoehrmann" <derhoermi@gmx.net>
Cc: <public-ws-desc-comments@w3.org>

Thanks for your comment.  The WS Description Working Group tracked this issue as a CR003 [1].  The Working Group did not agree to make a change to our spec at this point, based on the widespread use of this media type.  For a more detailed rationale see [2].   

Unless you let us know otherwise by 13 April, we will assume you agree with the resolution of this issue.

[1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/cr-issues/#CR003
[2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2006Jan/0028.html

 [  Jonathan Marsh  ][  jmarsh@microsoft.com  ][  http://spaces.msn.com/auburnmarshes  ]


> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bjoern Hoehrmann [mailto:derhoermi@gmx.net]
> Sent: Tuesday, January 10, 2006 5:47 PM
> To: Jonathan Marsh
> Cc: public-ws-desc-comments@w3.org
> Subject: Re: wsdl20-adjuncts vs RFC 4288
> 
> * Jonathan Marsh wrote:
> >I assume you are referring to the specific support for the
> >application/x-www-url-form-encoded media type.  Are you suggesting the
> >functionality should be associated with some different media type (if so
> >which one)?  Or do you think the ability to describe interactions of
> >this sort should be dropped?
> 
> I am not too concerned about the solution at the moment so long as the
> specification does not encourage discouraged use of media types. E.g.,
> rather than a media type, a special string could be used instead.
> --
> Björn Höhrmann · mailto:bjoern@hoehrmann.de · http://bjoern.hoehrmann.de
> Weinh. Str. 22 · Telefon: +49(0)621/4309674 · http://www.bjoernsworld.de
> 68309 Mannheim · PGP Pub. KeyID: 0xA4357E78 · http://www.websitedev.de/
Received on Thursday, 16 March 2006 23:06:07 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:20:32 GMT