W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ws-desc-comments@w3.org > January 2006

Re: wsdl20-adjuncts vs RFC 4288

From: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>
Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2006 02:47:12 +0100
To: "Jonathan Marsh" <jmarsh@microsoft.com>
Cc: <public-ws-desc-comments@w3.org>
Message-ID: <kno8s1tn7n0f1o1bugd6ehgadqi91ko38q@hive.bjoern.hoehrmann.de>

* Jonathan Marsh wrote:
>I assume you are referring to the specific support for the
>application/x-www-url-form-encoded media type.  Are you suggesting the
>functionality should be associated with some different media type (if so
>which one)?  Or do you think the ability to describe interactions of
>this sort should be dropped?

I am not too concerned about the solution at the moment so long as the
specification does not encourage discouraged use of media types. E.g.,
rather than a media type, a special string could be used instead.
-- 
Björn Höhrmann · mailto:bjoern@hoehrmann.de · http://bjoern.hoehrmann.de
Weinh. Str. 22 · Telefon: +49(0)621/4309674 · http://www.bjoernsworld.de
68309 Mannheim · PGP Pub. KeyID: 0xA4357E78 · http://www.websitedev.de/ 
Received on Wednesday, 11 January 2006 01:46:39 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:20:32 GMT