Re: wsdl20-adjuncts vs RFC 4288

* Jonathan Marsh wrote:
>I assume you are referring to the specific support for the
>application/x-www-url-form-encoded media type.  Are you suggesting the
>functionality should be associated with some different media type (if so
>which one)?  Or do you think the ability to describe interactions of
>this sort should be dropped?

I am not too concerned about the solution at the moment so long as the
specification does not encourage discouraged use of media types. E.g.,
rather than a media type, a special string could be used instead.
-- 
Björn Höhrmann · mailto:bjoern@hoehrmann.de · http://bjoern.hoehrmann.de
Weinh. Str. 22 · Telefon: +49(0)621/4309674 · http://www.bjoernsworld.de
68309 Mannheim · PGP Pub. KeyID: 0xA4357E78 · http://www.websitedev.de/