W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ws-desc-comments@w3.org > January 2006

RE: wsdl20-adjuncts vs RFC 4288

From: Jonathan Marsh <jmarsh@microsoft.com>
Date: Thu, 5 Jan 2006 11:42:25 -0800
Message-ID: <37D0366A39A9044286B2783EB4C3C4E8012AAAC3@RED-MSG-10.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
To: "Bjoern Hoehrmann" <derhoermi@gmx.net>, <public-ws-desc-comments@w3.org>

I assume you are referring to the specific support for the application/x-www-url-form-encoded media type.  Are you suggesting the functionality should be associated with some different media type (if so which one)?  Or do you think the ability to describe interactions of this sort should be dropped?

> -----Original Message-----
> From: public-ws-desc-comments-request@w3.org [mailto:public-ws-desc-
> comments-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Bjoern Hoehrmann
> Sent: Tuesday, December 13, 2005 3:36 AM
> To: public-ws-desc-comments@w3.org
> Subject: wsdl20-adjuncts vs RFC 4288
> 
> 
> Dear Web Services Description Working Group,
> 
>   http://www.w3.org/TR/2005/WD-wsdl20-adjuncts-20050803 apparently
> encourages use and implementation of media types that are discouraged
> per RFC 4288 section 3.4. I don't think it is appropriate to do this,
> the document should be changed such that it does not encourage in-
> appropriate use of media types.
> 
> regards,
> --
> Björn Höhrmann · mailto:bjoern@hoehrmann.de · http://bjoern.hoehrmann.de
> Weinh. Str. 22 · Telefon: +49(0)621/4309674 · http://www.bjoernsworld.de
> 68309 Mannheim · PGP Pub. KeyID: 0xA4357E78 · http://www.websitedev.de/
Received on Thursday, 5 January 2006 19:43:04 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:20:32 GMT