W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ws-desc-comments@w3.org > September 2005

RE: RPC style: an example defines a type

From: Jonathan Marsh <jmarsh@microsoft.com>
Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2005 12:11:24 -0700
Message-ID: <37D0366A39A9044286B2783EB4C3C4E81A28C8@RED-MSG-10.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
To: "Hugo Haas" <hugo@w3.org>
Cc: <public-ws-desc-comments@w3.org>

Thanks for your comment.  The WS Description Working Group tracked this
as a Last Call comment LC316 [1].  The Working Group agreed to add the
wrpc namespace to table 1-1; and in section 4.1.2, insert "excerpt" to
clarify that this is not the full normative description.

If we don't hear otherwise within two weeks, we will assume this
satisfies your concern.

[1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/lc-issues/issues.html#LC316

> -----Original Message-----
> From: public-ws-desc-comments-request@w3.org [mailto:public-ws-desc-
> comments-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Hugo Haas
> Sent: Wednesday, August 24, 2005 3:11 AM
> To: public-ws-desc-comments@w3.org
> Subject: RPC style: an example defines a type
> 
> This is an editorial comment.
> 
> Section 4.1.2 XML Representation of the wrpc:signature Extension in
> Part 2 states:
> 
>   See Example 4-1 for a definition of this type.
> 
> We should change the mark-up as this is peculiar for an example to
> define something in the spec.
> 
> --
> Hugo Haas - W3C
> mailto:hugo@w3.org - http://www.w3.org/People/Hugo/
Received on Thursday, 15 September 2005 19:11:42 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:20:32 GMT