- From: Jonathan Marsh <jmarsh@microsoft.com>
- Date: Thu, 15 Sep 2005 11:55:01 -0700
- To: "Hugo Haas" <hugo@w3.org>
- Cc: <public-ws-desc-comments@w3.org>
Thanks for your comment. The WS Description Working Group tracked this as a Last Call comment LC302 [1]. The Working Group agreed to fix the issue as you suggeset. If we don't hear otherwise within two weeks, we will assume this satisfies your concern. [1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/lc-issues/issues.html#LC302 > -----Original Message----- > From: public-ws-desc-comments-request@w3.org [mailto:public-ws-desc- > comments-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Hugo Haas > Sent: Friday, August 05, 2005 6:37 AM > To: public-ws-desc-comments@w3.org > Subject: URI comparison reference > > Section 2.20 Comparing URIs and IRIs in Part 1 references: > > [TAG URI FINDING] > TAG Finding on URI Comparison, X. Foo, Y. Bar, Authors. W3C > Technical Architecture Group, Month, Year. Draft available at > http://www.textuality.com/tag/uri-comp-4. > > This is a draft TAG finding, whose content is mainly identical to the > IRI spec's Simple String Comparison section, which is a much more > stable document. > > Therefore, I would like us to use section 5.3.1. Simple String > Comparison of RFC 3987 as the normative way to compare IRIs in WSDL > 2.0 documents. > > Cheers, > > Hugo > > -- > Hugo Haas - W3C > mailto:hugo@w3.org - http://www.w3.org/People/Hugo/
Received on Thursday, 15 September 2005 18:55:41 UTC