W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ws-desc-comments@w3.org > November 2005

RE: What is a valid WSDL component model?

From: Jonathan Marsh <jmarsh@microsoft.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2005 14:38:44 -0800
Message-ID: <37D0366A39A9044286B2783EB4C3C4E8BB0AAE@RED-MSG-10.redmond.corp.microsoft.com>
To: "Asir Vedamuthu" <asirveda@microsoft.com>
Cc: <public-ws-desc-comments@w3.org>
Thanks for your comment.  The WS Description Working Group tracked this
as a Last Call comment LC353 [1].  We accepted the proposal at
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2005Nov/0008.html
<http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-ws-desc/2005Oct/0051.html>  to
address this problem.

 

As we plan to go to CR shortly, if we don't hear from you within 10
days, we will assume this satisfies your concern.

 

[1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/5/lc-issues/issues.html#LC353

 

________________________________

From: public-ws-desc-comments-request@w3.org
[mailto:public-ws-desc-comments-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Asir
Vedamuthu
Sent: Saturday, September 24, 2005 8:06 PM
To: public-ws-desc-comments@w3.org
Subject: What is a valid WSDL component model?

 

Part 1 claims, "An XML 1.0 document that is valid with respect to the
WSDL 2.0 XML Schema and that maps to a valid WSDL 2.0 Component Model is
conformant to the WSDL 2.0 specification." [1]

 

What is a valid WSDL 2.0 Component Model? Part 1 does not describe this.

 

[1] http://www.w3.org/TR/2005/WD-wsdl20-20050803/#markup

 

Regards,

 

Asir S Vedamuthu, Microsoft
Received on Monday, 14 November 2005 22:52:38 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:20:32 GMT