W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ws-desc-comments@w3.org > May 2005

RE: mustUnderstand" - ??

From: Asir Vedamuthu <asirv@webmethods.com>
Date: Fri, 6 May 2005 14:24:31 -0400
Message-ID: <5B10E50E14A4594EB1B5566B69AD9407068E6BAB@maileast>
To: 'Jonathan Marsh' <jmarsh@microsoft.com>, Asir Vedamuthu <asirv@webmethods.com>
Cc: public-ws-desc-comments@w3.org

Thank you for considering my comment.

Asir

-----Original Message-----
From: public-ws-desc-comments-request@w3.org
[mailto:public-ws-desc-comments-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Jonathan Marsh
Sent: Thursday, May 05, 2005 7:35 PM
To: Asir Vedamuthu
Cc: public-ws-desc-comments@w3.org
Subject: RE: mustUnderstand" - ??



Thank you for you comment.  We tracked it as LC24 [1], and closed it as
subsumed by the resolution of LC76d [2].  The fix is in the latest
editor's draft [3].  We'll assume you agree with our disposition of LC24
if we don't hear from you within two weeks.

[1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/4/lc-issues/issues.html#LC24
[2] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/4/lc-issues/issues.html#LC76d
[3]
http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/ws/desc/wsdl20/wsdl20-adjuncts.
html

> -----Original Message-----
> From: public-ws-desc-comments-request@w3.org [mailto:public-ws-desc-
> comments-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Asir Vedamuthu
> Sent: Tuesday, August 24, 2004 5:43 AM
> To: 'public-ws-desc-comments@w3.org'
> Subject: "ad:mustUnderstand" - ??
> 
> 
> ref: http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/WD-wsdl20-extensions-20040803/#adf-mu-
> att
> 
> http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/WD-wsdl20-extensions-20040803/#adf-http-
> serial
> 
> "You may choose to decorate your application data element declarations
> with
> an attribute with the namespace
> 'http://www.w3.org/2004/08/wsdl/feature/AD'
> and the local name "mustUnderstand". This indicates at the abstract
> level
> that the particular element thus decorated is mandatory, and
> implementations
> of this feature which support expression of mandatory data (i.e. the
> Application Data SOAP Module, see 3.2 Application Data Module) should
> mark
> them as mandatory in an appropriate way."
> 
> I haven't come across any use case where a receiver would say thou
> must say
> that I must understand. Are there any use cases? I heard someone say
> 'versioning'. Powerful keyword! Doesn't connect in this context tho'.
> 
> Also, how does ad:mustUnderstand annotation map to HTTP feature-
> binding,
> http://www.w3.org/2004/08/wsdl/feature/AD-HTTP ? What is a feature-
> binding?
> That is another issue.
> 
> I request the WG to remove ad:mustUnderstand annotation attribute.
> 
> Regards,
> Asir S Vedamuthu
> asirv at webmethods dot com
> http://www.webmethods.com/
Received on Friday, 6 May 2005 18:24:48 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:20:31 GMT