W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ws-desc-comments@w3.org > May 2005

RE: URI Style and SOAP Response Pattern

From: Asir Vedamuthu <asirv@webmethods.com>
Date: Fri, 6 May 2005 11:24:00 -0700
Message-ID: <5B10E50E14A4594EB1B5566B69AD9407068E6BAA@maileast>
To: 'Jonathan Marsh' <jmarsh@microsoft.com>, Asir Vedamuthu <asirv@webmethods.com>
Cc: public-ws-desc-comments@w3.org

Thank you for considering my comment.

Asir

-----Original Message-----
From: public-ws-desc-comments-request@w3.org
[mailto:public-ws-desc-comments-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Jonathan Marsh
Sent: Thursday, May 05, 2005 7:28 PM
To: Asir Vedamuthu
Cc: public-ws-desc-comments@w3.org
Subject: RE: URI Style and SOAP Response Pattern



Thank you for you comment.  We tracked it as LC22 [1], and closed it as
subsumed by the resolution of LC21 [2].  The fix is in the latest
editor's draft [3].  We'll assume you agree with our disposition of LC21
if we don't hear from you within two weeks.

[1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/4/lc-issues/issues.html#LC22
[2] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/4/lc-issues/issues.html#LC21
[3]
http://dev.w3.org/cvsweb/~checkout~/2002/ws/desc/wsdl20/wsdl20-adjuncts.
html

> -----Original Message-----
> From: public-ws-desc-comments-request@w3.org [mailto:public-ws-desc-
> comments-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Asir Vedamuthu
> Sent: Tuesday, August 24, 2004 4:31 AM
> To: 'public-ws-desc-comments@w3.org'
> Subject: URI Style and SOAP Response Pattern
> 
> 
> ref:
> 
> [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/WD-wsdl20-bindings-20040803/#soap-
> defaults
> [2]
> http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/WD-wsdl20-bindings-20040803/#_http_x-www-
> form-urle
> ncoded
> 
> "If the {soap mep} property of the Binding Operation component has the
> value
> "http://www.w3.org/2003/05/soap/mep/soap-response/" then the URI to
> execute
> the HTTP GET against MUST be generated using the HTTP binding's rules
> for
> generating a URI for HTTP GET (see 3. WSDL HTTP Binding). The input
> serialization format of x-www-form-urlencoded is the only supported
> serialization format for HTTP GET in the SOAP Response Message
> Exchange
> Pattern." [1]
> 
> "This serialization format is designed to allow a Web Service to
> produce a
> URI based on the instance data of input messages. It may only be used
> for
> interface operation using the URI Style format as defined in 3.9.1 URI
> Style."
> 
> It appears to me that there is a strong relationship between the value
> of
> Message Reference.{style} and {soap mep} properties. Particularly, if
> {soap
> mep} has the value "http://www.w3.org/2003/05/soap/mep/soap-response/"
> then
> {style} must be  http://www.w3.org/2004/08/wsdl/style/uri Is that
> true? If
> so, shall we state it? And, shall we establish a default binding rule?
> Are
> there too many iffs?
> 
> Regards,
> Asir S Vedamuthu
> asirv at webmethods dot com
> http://www.webmethods.com/
Received on Friday, 6 May 2005 18:24:12 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:20:31 GMT