W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ws-desc-comments@w3.org > October 2004

RE: Multipart Style and {direction}=out

From: Asir Vedamuthu <asirv@webmethods.com>
Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2004 06:54:38 -0700
Message-ID: <5B10E50E14A4594EB1B5566B69AD9407068E6885@maileast>
To: 'Jonathan Marsh' <jmarsh@microsoft.com>, Asir Vedamuthu <asirv@webmethods.com>, public-ws-desc-comments@w3.org

Thank you for considering my request and I agree with the resolution.

Regards,
Asir S Vedamuthu
asirv at webmethods dot com
http://www.webmethods.com/

-----Original Message-----
From: Jonathan Marsh [mailto:jmarsh@microsoft.com] 
Sent: Thursday, October 14, 2004 5:00 PM
To: Asir Vedamuthu; public-ws-desc-comments@w3.org
Subject: RE: Multipart Style and {direction}=out


For the record, the Working Group found that there is utility in
specifying the Multipart style on both inputs and outputs, and that
separate control was desirable.  It also envisions that this capability
might be useful to style developers.  Accordingly it agreed to: 1) move
{style} from operations to message reference components, 2) change
operation/@style to operation/@styleDefault and update the infoset
mapping for message reference {style} to combine the value of this
attribute with messageReference/@style, 3) change the Multipart and URI
styles to be direction independent, and 4) make corresponding changes
elsewhere in the documents.

Accordingly, the Working Group closed this issue [1].  If we don't hear
from you by the 28th of October we assume you agree with this
resolution.

[1] http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/desc/4/lc-issues/issues.html#LC21

> -----Original Message-----
> From: public-ws-desc-comments-request@w3.org [mailto:public-ws-desc-
> comments-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Asir Vedamuthu
> Sent: Tuesday, August 24, 2004 4:07 AM
> To: 'public-ws-desc-comments@w3.org'
> Subject: Multipart Style and {direction}=out
> 
> 
> ref:
> http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/WD-wsdl20-bindings-
> 20040803/#_operation_multipart_
> style
> 
> "The Multipart style is selected by assigning the Interface Operation
> component's {style} property the value
> http://www.w3.org/2004/08/wsdl/style/multipart.
> 
> The Multipart style may only be used for Interface Operation
components
> whose {message exchange pattern} property has the value
> 'http://www.w3.org/2004/08/wsdl/in-only',
> 'http://www.w3.org/2004/08/wsdl/robust-in-only' or
> 'http://www.w3.org/2004/08/wsdl/in-out'.
> 
> Use of this value indicates that XML Schema [XML Schema Structures]
was
> used
> to define the schemas of the {element} properties of all Message
Reference
> components of the Interface Operation component with {direction}
property
> in. Those schemas MUST adhere to the rules below"
> 
> 
> Why is multipart style limited to {direction}=in? Shall we allow
multipart
> style for all message reference components with {direction}=out? If
> positive, then proposed change is,
> 
> <proposed>
> Use of this value indicates that XML Schema [XML Schema Structures]
was
> used
> to define the schemas of the {element} properties of all Message
Reference
> components of the Interface Operation component. Those schemas MUST
adhere
> to the rules below. ..,
> </proposed>
> 
> Regards,
> Asir S Vedamuthu
> asirv at webmethods dot com
> http://www.webmethods.com/
Received on Thursday, 21 October 2004 13:55:17 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:20:31 GMT