W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ws-chor@w3.org > November 2006

Re: Exchange type issue

From: Charlton Barreto <charlton_b@mac.com>
Date: Sun, 05 Nov 2006 22:57:05 +0000
Message-ID: <454E6C41.60203@mac.com>
To: "Monica J. Martin" <Monica.Martin@Sun.COM>
CC: Steve Ross-Talbot <steve@pi4tech.com>, Martin Chapman <martin.chapman@oracle.com>, "'Gary Brown'" <gary@pi4tech.com>, "'WS-Choreography List'" <public-ws-chor@w3.org>

Monica J. Martin wrote:
>
>> Steve Ross-Talbot wrote: Monica,
>> I take your point about religiosity. As regards clarity around the  
>> new exchange type and semantics I do not think it changes the  
>> semantics of anything in WS-CDL at all. Rather it makes explicit  
>> something that is today implicit. So in a sense it tidies things up.
>>
>> Cheers
>> Steve T
>
> We have yet to consider that the only difference is the 'respond' is 
> not tied to a 'request.' Therefore, this could be accommodated by 
> allowing a respond that may or may not be tied to a request. As Gary 
> said there is no other difference.  Thanks.
>
True, there is no other difference. However, having the new exchange 
type makes explicit the exchange pattern represented by the choreo. As 
there is no semantic difference, I see no logical reason not to have the 
new exchange type.

-Charlton.
Received on Sunday, 5 November 2006 22:57:11 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Saturday, 18 December 2010 01:01:47 GMT