- From: Charlton Barreto <charlton_b@mac.com>
- Date: Sun, 05 Nov 2006 22:57:05 +0000
- To: "Monica J. Martin" <Monica.Martin@Sun.COM>
- CC: Steve Ross-Talbot <steve@pi4tech.com>, Martin Chapman <martin.chapman@oracle.com>, "'Gary Brown'" <gary@pi4tech.com>, "'WS-Choreography List'" <public-ws-chor@w3.org>
Monica J. Martin wrote: > >> Steve Ross-Talbot wrote: Monica, >> I take your point about religiosity. As regards clarity around the >> new exchange type and semantics I do not think it changes the >> semantics of anything in WS-CDL at all. Rather it makes explicit >> something that is today implicit. So in a sense it tidies things up. >> >> Cheers >> Steve T > > We have yet to consider that the only difference is the 'respond' is > not tied to a 'request.' Therefore, this could be accommodated by > allowing a respond that may or may not be tied to a request. As Gary > said there is no other difference. Thanks. > True, there is no other difference. However, having the new exchange type makes explicit the exchange pattern represented by the choreo. As there is no semantic difference, I see no logical reason not to have the new exchange type. -Charlton.
Received on Sunday, 5 November 2006 22:57:11 UTC