W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ws-chor@w3.org > November 2006

Re: Exchange type issue

From: Charlton Barreto <charlton_b@mac.com>
Date: Sun, 05 Nov 2006 22:57:05 +0000
Message-ID: <454E6C41.60203@mac.com>
To: "Monica J. Martin" <Monica.Martin@Sun.COM>
CC: Steve Ross-Talbot <steve@pi4tech.com>, Martin Chapman <martin.chapman@oracle.com>, "'Gary Brown'" <gary@pi4tech.com>, "'WS-Choreography List'" <public-ws-chor@w3.org>

Monica J. Martin wrote:
>> Steve Ross-Talbot wrote: Monica,
>> I take your point about religiosity. As regards clarity around the  
>> new exchange type and semantics I do not think it changes the  
>> semantics of anything in WS-CDL at all. Rather it makes explicit  
>> something that is today implicit. So in a sense it tidies things up.
>> Cheers
>> Steve T
> We have yet to consider that the only difference is the 'respond' is 
> not tied to a 'request.' Therefore, this could be accommodated by 
> allowing a respond that may or may not be tied to a request. As Gary 
> said there is no other difference.  Thanks.
True, there is no other difference. However, having the new exchange 
type makes explicit the exchange pattern represented by the choreo. As 
there is no semantic difference, I see no logical reason not to have the 
new exchange type.

Received on Sunday, 5 November 2006 22:57:11 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:01:10 UTC