Re: Exchange type issue

> Steve Ross-Talbot wrote: Monica,
> I take your point about religiosity. As regards clarity around the  
> new exchange type and semantics I do not think it changes the  
> semantics of anything in WS-CDL at all. Rather it makes explicit  
> something that is today implicit. So in a sense it tidies things up.
>
> Cheers
> Steve T

We have yet to consider that the only difference is the 'respond' is not 
tied to a 'request.' Therefore, this could be accommodated by allowing a 
respond that may or may not be tied to a request. As Gary said there is 
no other difference.  Thanks.