W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ws-chor@w3.org > November 2006

Re: Exchange type issue

From: Monica J. Martin <Monica.Martin@Sun.COM>
Date: Sun, 05 Nov 2006 14:19:00 -0800
To: Steve Ross-Talbot <steve@pi4tech.com>
Cc: Charlton Barreto <charlton_b@mac.com>, Martin Chapman <martin.chapman@oracle.com>, "'Gary Brown'" <gary@pi4tech.com>, "'WS-Choreography List'" <public-ws-chor@w3.org>
Message-id: <454E6354.7080400@sun.com>


> Steve Ross-Talbot wrote: Monica,
> I take your point about religiosity. As regards clarity around the  
> new exchange type and semantics I do not think it changes the  
> semantics of anything in WS-CDL at all. Rather it makes explicit  
> something that is today implicit. So in a sense it tidies things up.
>
> Cheers
> Steve T

We have yet to consider that the only difference is the 'respond' is not 
tied to a 'request.' Therefore, this could be accommodated by allowing a 
respond that may or may not be tied to a request. As Gary said there is 
no other difference.  Thanks.
Received on Sunday, 5 November 2006 22:19:13 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Saturday, 18 December 2010 01:01:47 GMT