- From: Steve Ross-Talbot <steve@enigmatec.net>
- Date: Wed, 29 Sep 2004 19:51:40 +0100
- To: "rayluo" <rayluo@rogers.com>
- Cc: <chiusano_joseph@bah.com>, <public-ws-chor@w3.org>
Interesting discussion given this is on the choreography public mailing list. The Choreography approach is by design. That is you design a global model that contractually prevents unwanted FI. So in a sense it is impossible to get unwanted FI because all of the valid interaction are modeled. This works for many real problems in which the parties concerned wish to interact to do some business transactions. For example most if not all financial service xaction are done this way. Hence the use of vertical standards. What we do in Choreo (through WS-CDL) is provide a standard way of describing such interaction from a neutral perspective thus ensuring peer-to-peerness is maintained (so no orchestration is needed) and providing a sound description language that enables such "global-models" to be defined. Take a look at FIX (www.fixprotocol.org) as a real example of such a protocol. Cheers Steve T On 29 Sep 2004, at 22:15, rayluo wrote: > Hi Chiusano, > > Thanks for your reply. Yes, sometimes the undesirable FI (Feature > Interaction) can be avoided if the consumer and provider have enough > "awareness". But how to achieve it? That is one of the purpose of my > thesis: try to collect FI examples as many as possible,categorise and > document them. Hope to offer a reference for web service designer and > developer in the future. I have spent 15 months to explore those kinds > of examples. But not enough examples can be identified. > > Thanks, > > Ray
Received on Wednesday, 29 September 2004 18:51:58 UTC