W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ws-chor@w3.org > June 2004

Issue 490

From: Steve Ross-Talbot <steve@enigmatec.net>
Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 11:06:17 +0100
Message-Id: <F64F39BD-C9B3-11D8-AEC6-000393D13C9A@enigmatec.net>
To: WS-Choreography List <public-ws-chor@w3.org> 

Summary:
	CDL - Issue I-03

Description:
Issue I-03. Do we add additional standard states to describe the 
outcomes of using reliable messaging protocols? Similarly, should we 
include additional states to handle other outcomes, such as security 
failure

Resolution:
No we do not need any states at all. We simply need some mechanism for 
the naming of a state or an observable interaction or non-interaction. 
WS-CDL already supports this so there is nothing further to do.

Proposal:
	Change status from ASSIGNED to RESOLVED WONTFIX
Received on Tuesday, 29 June 2004 06:06:27 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 27 October 2009 06:36:26 GMT