Issue 490 from Steve Ross-Talbot on 2004-06-29 (public-ws-chor@w3.org from June 2004)

From: Steve Ross-Talbot <steve@enigmatec.net>
Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2004 11:06:17 +0100
To: WS-Choreography List <public-ws-chor@w3.org>
Message-Id: <F64F39BD-C9B3-11D8-AEC6-000393D13C9A@enigmatec.net>

Summary:
	CDL - Issue I-03

Description:
Issue I-03. Do we add additional standard states to describe the 
outcomes of using reliable messaging protocols? Similarly, should we 
include additional states to handle other outcomes, such as security 
failure

Resolution:
No we do not need any states at all. We simply need some mechanism for 
the naming of a state or an observable interaction or non-interaction. 
WS-CDL already supports this so there is nothing further to do.

Proposal:
	Change status from ASSIGNED to RESOLVED WONTFIX

Received on Tuesday, 29 June 2004 06:06:27 UTC