W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ws-chor@w3.org > February 2004

RE: WSDL and pub/sub

From: Ugo Corda <UCorda@SeeBeyond.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2004 13:11:17 -0800
Message-ID: <EDDE2977F3D216428E903370E3EBDDC9032B8A4F@MAIL01.stc.com>
To: "Farrukh Najmi" <Farrukh.Najmi@Sun.COM>
Cc: "Monica J. Martin" <Monica.Martin@Sun.COM>, "Burdett, David" <david.burdett@commerceone.com>, "Andrew Berry" <andyb@whyanbeel.net>, "Steve Ross-Talbot" <steve@enigmatec.net>, "WS Choreography" <public-ws-chor@w3.org>

The specs have not been donated yet (as far as I know), but some of the
authors pledged to do that in the near future. 
My question was intended to sense any interest/feedback regarding these
specs coming from the ebXML Registry TC.

Ugo

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Farrukh Najmi [mailto:Farrukh.Najmi@Sun.COM] 
> Sent: Monday, February 16, 2004 1:01 PM
> To: Ugo Corda
> Cc: Monica J. Martin; Burdett, David; Andrew Berry; Steve 
> Ross-Talbot; WS Choreography
> Subject: Re: WSDL and pub/sub
> 
> 
> Ugo Corda wrote:
> 
> >Farrukh,
> >
> >Do you guys have any plan of adopting one of the emerging pub/sub 
> >specs, i.e. WS-Eventing or WS-Notification?
> >  
> >
> We (ebXML Registry TC) would certainly align future versions of our 
> specs with open and approved standards in this area as they emerge.
> 
> We would also need to make sure that our content-based eventing 
> requirements are addressed
> by participating and contributing to the development of open 
> standards 
> in this space.
> 
> Please correct me if I am mistaken but my impression is that at this 
> stage neither of the specs you mention
> have been donated to an standards body.
> 
> Thanks.
> 
> -- 
> Regards,
> Farrukh
> 
> 
> >Thank you,
> >Ugo
> >
> >  
> >
> >>-----Original Message-----
> >>From: Farrukh Najmi [mailto:Farrukh.Najmi@Sun.COM]
> >>Sent: Monday, February 16, 2004 10:05 AM
> >>To: Monica J. Martin
> >>Cc: Burdett, David; 'Andrew Berry'; Ugo Corda; Steve 
> >>Ross-Talbot; WS Choreography
> >>Subject: Re: WSDL and pub/sub
> >>
> >>
> >>Monica J. Martin wrote:
> >>
> >>    
> >>
> >>>Burdett, David wrote:
> >>>
> >>>      
> >>>
> >>>>I think so. I submitted an Auction Use case where 
> registered users 
> >>>>could subscribe to a particular auction so that they were
> >>>>        
> >>>>
> >>notified of
> >>    
> >>
> >>>>bids. See the attachment on ...
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>        
> >>>>
> >>http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-chor/2004Jan/002
> >>    
> >>
> >9.html
> >  
> >
> >>>David
> >>>
> >>>      
> >>>
> >>mm1: The capability already exists in Reg/Rep for event 
> notification, 
> >>supports web services, and it is an open standard. I've cc: Farrukh 
> >>Najmi who is the technical lead. Thanks.
> >>
> >>
> >>    
> >>
> >This is correct.
> >
> >ebXML Registry version 2.5 has Content-based (as opposed to 
> >topic-based)
> >
> >event notification where selection of events are done by 
> focused ad hoc
> >queries using SQL or XML Filter query syntax. Notification may be 
> >delivered to a SOAP Service or via email. Please let me know 
> if I can 
> >answer any specific questions.
> >
> >Thanks.
> >
> >  
> >
> 
> 
> 
> 
Received on Monday, 16 February 2004 16:11:18 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Saturday, 18 December 2010 01:00:51 GMT