W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ws-chor@w3.org > February 2004

Re: Fwd: UDDI and sematics

From: Monica J. Martin <Monica.Martin@Sun.COM>
Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2004 06:09:10 -0700
To: Steve Ross-Talbot <steve@enigmatec.net>
Cc: "WS Choreography (E-mail)" <public-ws-chor@w3.org>
Message-id: <402F6F76.7040609@sun.com>


> SRT: All:
>
> Given the request for review and given that choreographies may be  
> subject to something similar for location it is a good idea if we 
> start  the process of review and requirements gathering for this piece 
> of work  and then get back to them in a timely fashion.

mm1: Steve, these requirements should be generic as Reg/Rep also handles 
web services and had a Semantic Content Management subgroup. Suggest we 
distribute to both groups. Kathryn Breininger is the OASIS co-chair 
(kathryn.r.breininger@boeing.com) and Farrukh Najmi, the technical lead 
(farrukh.najmi@sun.com).

Thanks.

>> Resent-From: public-sws-ig@w3.org
>> From: Max Voskob <max.voskob@paradise.net.nz>
>> Date: 6 February 2004 03:02:05 GMT
>> To: public-sws-ig@w3.org, www-rdf-interest@w3.org,  
>> semanticweb@yahoogroups.com
>> Subject: UDDI and sematics
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> As some of you may be aware, UDDI Technical Committee is considering  
>> to add some semantic capabilities in the next version.
>>
>> I would invite a wider community to review our attempts.
>>
>> http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/download.php/5337/uddi-spec-tc- 
>> req11-14-semantics-20040205.doc
>> http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/download.php/5322/uddi-spec-tc- 
>> taxonomies-discussion-20040205.doc
>>
>> Your feedback is very welcome. Feel free to say that we are on a 
>> wrong  track or that the author had no clue what he was talking about 
>> in that  document.
>
Received on Sunday, 15 February 2004 08:09:17 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Saturday, 18 December 2010 01:00:51 GMT