W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ws-chor@w3.org > November 2003

Re: Fwd: A trial balloon distinction between choreography

From: Howard N Smith <howard.smith@ontology.org>
Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2003 19:47:19 +0000
Message-Id: <5.0.2.1.2.20031112194135.06b16de8@pop3.demon.co.uk>
To: public-ws-chor@w3.org

Steve said:

>As an aside from all of the stuff going on in requirements I would be interested on peoples take on what Frank postulated as a distinction between the O word and the C word. 

Not putting it in technical terms, it seems to me that:

Choreography can be considered to be what happens when things are orchestrated. 
A choregraphy interface is whatever is needed to allow orchestration to occur, and cause choregraphy to be observed.
The conductor of an orchestra is clearly managing the production of music between the participants. 
The choreography is what happens as a result ... the music. But for this to happen, players need some form of
interface to those around them, and to the conductor. 

I apologise if I've not been following the subtlty of the technical debate around this [I promise I will catch up].

Howard



---

New Book - Business Process Management: The Third Wave
www.bpm3.com

Howard Smith/CSC/BPMI.org
cell             +44 7711 594 494 (worldwide)
home office +44 20 8660 1963
Received on Wednesday, 12 November 2003 14:49:36 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Saturday, 18 December 2010 01:00:40 GMT