- From: Jon Dart <jdart@tibco.com>
- Date: Tue, 13 May 2003 09:53:45 -0700
- To: Assaf Arkin <arkin@intalio.com>
- CC: Jean-Jacques Dubray <jjd@eigner.com>, "'Burdett David'" <david.burdett@commerceone.com>, Daniel_Austin@grainger.com, public-ws-chor@w3.org
I'm tending towards Assaf's point of view here. However, there is DAML-S to consider also. Per our charter, we are suppose to liase with the DAML-S group. But this doesn't imply a non-WSDL binding because apparently DAML-S is based on extensions within the WSDL framework. --Jon Assaf Arkin wrote: > I just don't see those other technologies as being interesting that's > all. My personal opinion. In a W3C working group I would prefer to pick > all the relevant technologies that the W3C maps out as interesting as > part of the WSA. So far I've only heard of WSDL. If it boils down to one > technology and that makes my life easier, all the better. What other > technologies do you suggest we look into? >
Received on Tuesday, 13 May 2003 12:53:54 UTC