W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ws-chor@w3.org > June 2003

Re: Partial executability/ determinism of a Chor description language

From: Monica J. Martin <monica.martin@sun.com>
Date: Sun, 01 Jun 2003 20:40:54 -0600
Message-ID: <3EDAB936.2030002@sun.com>
To: Ricky Ho <riho@cisco.com>
CC: "Burdett, David" <david.burdett@commerceone.com>, public-ws-chor@w3.org

Ricky Ho wrote:

> Monica,
>>> mm1: The choreography definition should not be a contract, although 
>>> it may understand the contract when its parameters are expressed in 
>>> logic (whether in or referenced by the choreography 
>>> definition,....we'll see).,
> If Choreography is a sequence of message exchange that every involved 
> party agree to follow, then it is a "contract".  Is WSDL a "contract" 
> ? (I think so).
> Best regards,
> Ricky
mm1:  I would say that the WSDL MAY be legally binding, but it is not 
the contract.
Received on Sunday, 1 June 2003 22:31:42 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Saturday, 18 December 2010 01:00:20 GMT