Re: Partial executability/ determinism of a Chor description language from Ricky Ho on 2003-06-02 (public-ws-chor@w3.org from June 2003)

From: Ricky Ho <riho@cisco.com>
Date: Sun, 01 Jun 2003 19:22:58 -0700
To: "Monica J. Martin" <monica.martin@sun.com>
Cc: "Burdett, David" <david.burdett@commerceone.com>, public-ws-chor@w3.org
Message-Id: <4.3.2.7.2.20030601191812.01bad410@franklin.cisco.com>

Monica,


>>mm1: The choreography definition should not be a contract, although it 
>>may understand the contract when its parameters are expressed in logic 
>>(whether in or referenced by the choreography definition,....we'll see).,

If Choreography is a sequence of message exchange that every involved party 
agree to follow, then it is a "contract".  Is WSDL a "contract" ? (I think so).

Best regards,
Ricky

Received on Sunday, 1 June 2003 22:23:47 UTC