W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ws-chor@w3.org > April 2003

RE: Abstract Bindable Choreography

From: Martin Chapman <martin.chapman@oracle.com>
Date: Fri, 4 Apr 2003 10:11:30 -0800
To: "'Burdett, David'" <david.burdett@commerceone.com>, "'WS Choreography \(E-mail\)'" <public-ws-chor@w3.org>
Message-ID: <003201c2fad5$9e0e23a0$6501a8c0@us.oracle.com>

David,

I have a strong feeling that you can get what you want by exstiing
technologies such as UML. In the past I have used use cases and activity
diagrams to express reusable interactions between parties. Diagramtic
notations are explicitly out of scope of our charter, and I'm not sure
if there is any benefit in a specific xml language  to express the same
thing.

Martin.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: public-ws-chor-request@w3.org 
> [mailto:public-ws-chor-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Burdett, David
> Sent: Thursday, April 03, 2003 11:09 AM
> To: WS Choreography (E-mail)
> Subject: Abstract Bindable Choreography
> 
> 
> There has been some discussion around the idea of an abstract 
> bindable choreography so I thought I would provide an example 
> in the form of a diagram (PDF) which shows the flow 
> associated with the placement of an order and an XML 
> representation of the same in a declarative style. I strongly 
> suggest you look at the diagram first.
> 
> Comments welcome ;-)
> 
> David
>  <<PlaceOrderChoreography.pdf>> 
>  <<PlaceOrderChoreography.xml>> 
> 
> Director, Product Management, Web Services
> Commerce One
> 4440 Rosewood Drive, Pleasanton, CA 94588, USA
> Tel/VMail: +1 (925) 520 4422; Cell: +1 (925) 216 7704 
mailto:david.burdett@commerceone.com; Web: http://www.commerceone.com
Received on Friday, 4 April 2003 13:13:13 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:00:58 UTC