Jon, Tony, Furthermore given the name (and charter?) of this group I would suggest that tying its work to Web services (and perhaps the work of the WSAG) would be the most sensible thing to do. While the notion of an abstract and bindable choreography standard does have a certain undeniable appeal, I think this group should really stick to a specific "binding" if you like (and XML Schema plus WSDL works for me because you can extend it nicely), and that should be for Web services (pick the definition that best suits you, but I guess things like ASN.1 are out of scope). JimReceived on Thursday, 3 April 2003 04:26:26 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 27 October 2009 06:36:02 GMT