W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ws-chor-comments@w3.org > May 2005

RE: W3C WS-Choreo WG - Issue 998

From: Tony Fletcher <tony_fletcher@btopenworld.com>
Date: Sun, 15 May 2005 20:40:32 +0100
To: "'Martin Chapman'" <martin.chapman@oracle.com>
Cc: <public-ws-chor-comments@w3.org>
Message-ID: <000601c55985$f73e12d0$6401a8c0@corp.choreology.com>

Dear Martin and the WS-Choreography team,

Contrary to my expectation it appears that for the current WS-Choreography
specification the ordering is defined for each and every element and that
lexically ordering is not used (as it is in at least some programming
languages such as Java).  So according to my present understanding this
resolution satisfies my concerns and I am happy for this issue to be closed.

Best Regards     Tony
A M Fletcher
Cohesions  (TM)
Business transaction management software for application coordination
Choreology Ltd., 68 Lombard Street, London EC3V 9LJ     UK
Tel: +44 (0) 1473 729537   Mobile: +44 (0) 7801 948219
tony.fletcher@choreology.com     (Home: amfletcher@iee.org)

-----Original Message-----
From: Martin Chapman [mailto:martin.chapman@oracle.com] 
Sent: 10 May 2005 15:30
Cc: public-ws-chor-comments@w3.org
Subject: W3C WS-Choreo WG - Issue 998


Regarding Issue 998 [1].

At its meeting on 12 April 2005 [2],  the work group agreed to close this
issue with no change to the spec

Please let the Working Group know if this resolution   
[1] is acceptable or not as soon as possible.



Martin Chapman                                 
Consulting Member of Technical Staff           
P: +353 87 687 6654                           
e: martin.chapman@oracle.com                   
Received on Sunday, 15 May 2005 20:29:22 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 19:46:24 UTC