* Martin Chapman wrote: >Also with respect to having Yves as the contact point, again this was >checked and is acceptable to W3C staff. I don't care much, but please note for example (the end of) * http://www.w3.org/mid/1767178229.20050609182027@w3.org * http://www.w3.org/mid/7C513C49-168B-4FED-9B40-BEAE3F1D7DA7@w3.org * http://www.w3.org/mid/840AEEC9-3164-49C7-A6ED-7B367CC2AC95@w3.org where the same issue came up in the QA review of the current SVG Tiny Working Draft. >On the remaining aspect of this issue, regarding security, the WG felt >that there was not much to add wrt to cdl being an xml document; it has >the same considerations as any other xml document. There are other >security considerations related to using the document to "compile" into >end point behaviour, and this is outlined in its own section (7.1). >In addition we have followed what the WSD WG said on this topic, since >CDL is of a similar nature to ESDL. We will raise this as a discussion >point at the next WS Coordination Group Call. Well, section 7.1 should be referred to then (for example). -- Björn Höhrmann · mailto:bjoern@hoehrmann.de · http://bjoern.hoehrmann.de Weinh. Str. 22 · Telefon: +49(0)621/4309674 · http://www.bjoernsworld.de 68309 Mannheim · PGP Pub. KeyID: 0xA4357E78 · http://www.websitedev.de/Received on Wednesday, 3 August 2005 19:44:22 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 8 January 2008 14:20:10 GMT