W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ws-async-tf@w3.org > May 2005

Re: Asynch Scenarios

From: David Hull <dmh@tibco.com>
Date: Wed, 11 May 2005 10:41:36 -0400
To: paul.downey@bt.com
Cc: michael.eder@nokia.com, dorchard@bea.com, public-ws-async-tf@w3.org
Message-id: <428219A0.7050108@tibco.com>
paul.downey@bt.com wrote:

> 
>David wrote:
>  
>
>>>Isn't this the use case of a resource-constrained device (e.g., a cell 
>>>phone) essentially polling a "server" to get requests, with the requests 
>>>coming back in the reply to the poll and the responses going out in 
>>>separate interactions?
>>>      
>>>
>
>Michael was kind enough to point me at his earlier mail which of  course
>i now recall reading:
>http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/public-ws-async-tf/2005Feb/0065.html
>
>I've also been wondering about the buckets being called 'one-way' and 'two-way'
>maybe there are some better names for to be found, or maybe better explanation
>is all that is required.
>  
>
I think that's essentially the distinction, except that correlation and 
back-channel are two separate facilities.

>In my mind t's the provision of a back-channel and correlation for the duration 
>of the MEP by the underlying protocol which is the distinction, rather than the 
>ability for messages to travel in either direction within a single conversation
>(connection).
>
>Paul 
>
>  
>
Received on Wednesday, 11 May 2005 14:49:28 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 + w3c-0.30 : Wednesday, 11 May 2005 14:49:28 GMT