W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ws-async-tf@w3.org > April 2005

Re: Minutes of 2005-04-06 call

From: David Hull <dmh@tibco.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Apr 2005 17:35:26 -0400
To: Anish Karmarkar <Anish.Karmarkar@oracle.com>
Cc: public-ws-async-tf@w3.org
Message-id: <425D909E.2030200@tibco.com>


I couldn't have put it better myself (though I did try :-)

Anish Karmarkar wrote:

> Apologies for missing the last concall.
> Perhaps I'm missing something here, but I don't understand why 
> transport level problems/faults (such as HTTP 404 status code) are 
> being discussed in the context of MEPs. The way I see it, there are 
> lot of things that can go wrong, even in the case of one-way MEP using 
> UDP. For example, there may be a DNS problem or a network disconnect 
> (for that matter non-transport related problems such as out-of-memory 
> errors can also occur). To me, this does not affect the MEP design in 
> any way. The application may have to deal with it as it may see that 
> error somehow/somewhere, but this does not change the MEP (from an 
> in-only to robust-in-only). In the case of SOAP the change from 
> in-only to robust-in-only has to be made iff there may be a SOAP-fault 
> coming back.
> -Anish
> -- 
> Hugo Haas wrote:
>>  are at:
>>     http://www.w3.org/2005/04/06-ws-async-minutes.html
Received on Wednesday, 13 April 2005 21:38:27 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 19:48:42 UTC