W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ws-addressing@w3.org > January 2007

Re: WS-Addressing comments relating to WS-Policy LC

From: Anish Karmarkar <Anish.Karmarkar@oracle.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2007 17:14:41 -0800
Message-ID: <45B01B81.7070003@oracle.com>
To: public-ws-policy@w3.org
CC: "[WS-A]" <public-ws-addressing@w3.org>

Wasn't the original decision to close the issue with no action based on 
the fact that majority wanted to proceed to LC?

-Anish
--

Christopher B Ferris wrote:
> 
> Bob,
> 
> The WS-Policy WG closed this issue with no action, based on the fact 
> that there was  no new evidence
> presented that would change the resolution to an original decision of 
> the WG that raised the same substantive
> question.
> 
> Please see the resolution text in the issue itself [1]
> 
> [1] http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=4129
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> Christopher Ferris
> STSM, Software Group Standards Strategy
> email: chrisfer@us.ibm.com
> blog: http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/blogs/page/chrisferris
> phone: +1 508 377 9295
> 
> public-ws-policy-request@w3.org wrote on 01/08/2007 08:13:31 PM:
> 
>  > The WS-Addressing WG has no specific comments concerning the LC
>  > drafts of WS-Policy.
>  > There is, however one specific Bugzilla Log, Number 4129 [1] which
>  > relates to WS-Addressing and the manner in which Policy may be
>  > attached to an epr.  This log has the interest of the WS-Addressing
>  > WG and the WG is interested in the manner of its resolution.
>  >  
>  > Thanks
>  > -bob
>  >  
>  > Bob Freund
>  > Chair, WS-Addressing for the WS-Addressing WG
>  >  
>  > [1] http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=4129
Received on Friday, 19 January 2007 01:16:54 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 2 June 2009 18:35:15 GMT