W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ws-addressing@w3.org > January 2007

Re: Some editorial issues with the Metadata document

From: David Hull <dmh@tibco.com>
Date: Mon, 08 Jan 2007 15:34:20 -0500
To: Philippe Le Hegaret <plh@w3.org>
Cc: "public-ws-addressing@w3.org" <public-ws-addressing@w3.org>
Message-id: <45A2AACC.1070605@tibco.com>

This is good, but I think what's missing here and elsewhere is which
variables are independent and which are dependent.  I think in this case
the first two are independent and the last dependent.

Philippe Le Hegaret wrote:
> On Mon, 2007-01-08 at 15:07 -0500, Philippe Le Hegaret wrote:
>> On Mon, 2007-01-08 at 11:49 -0500, David Hull wrote:
>> >     * I believe this has already been done to death, but my $0.02 on
>> >       table 3-1 is that it's not immediately clear what "REQUIRED"
>> >       means.  I'd naively  think it meant that the MAPs are required,
>> >       but that seems redundant in the row marked "yes" for MAPs in input
>> >       message.  From the subsequent text I gather it means "you have to
>> >       include the required MAPs."  Since the requirements are clearly
>> >       spelled out in section 5, perhaps "see section 5", or "as per
>> >       section 5" or such might be clearer.
>> The table is mixing several information making it difficult to read.
> The table format was lost in my message, so here is the table in HTML:
> *wsdl:required* 	*MAPs in Input message?* 	*MAPs in Output message?*
> true 	Yes 	Yes
> true 	No 	The endpoint MUST generate a SOAP Fault.
> false 	Yes 	Yes
> false 	No 	Optional. If using SOAP, MAP headers MUST NOT have a
> soap:mustUnderstand attribute with a value of "true"
> Philippe
Received on Monday, 8 January 2007 20:34:31 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:04:15 UTC