W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ws-addressing@w3.org > January 2007

Re: Some editorial issues with the Metadata document

From: Philippe Le Hegaret <plh@w3.org>
Date: Mon, 08 Jan 2007 15:29:46 -0500
To: "public-ws-addressing@w3.org" <public-ws-addressing@w3.org>
Message-Id: <1168288186.3048.103.camel@localhost>
On Mon, 2007-01-08 at 15:07 -0500, Philippe Le Hegaret wrote: 

> On Mon, 2007-01-08 at 11:49 -0500, David Hull wrote:
> >     * I believe this has already been done to death, but my $0.02 on
> >       table 3-1 is that it's not immediately clear what "REQUIRED"
> >       means.  I'd naively  think it meant that the MAPs are required,
> >       but that seems redundant in the row marked "yes" for MAPs in input
> >       message.  From the subsequent text I gather it means "you have to
> >       include the required MAPs."  Since the requirements are clearly
> >       spelled out in section 5, perhaps "see section 5", or "as per
> >       section 5" or such might be clearer.
> 
> The table is mixing several information making it difficult to read.



The table format was lost in my message, so here is the table in HTML:
     wsdl:required
 MAPs in Input message?
MAPs in Output message?
          true
Yes
Yes
          true
No
The endpoint MUST
generate a SOAP Fault.
         false
Yes
Yes
         false
No
Optional. If using SOAP,
MAP headers MUST NOT
have a
soap:mustUnderstand
attribute with a value
of "true"

Philippe
Received on Monday, 8 January 2007 20:32:00 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 2 June 2009 18:35:15 GMT