Re: Issue: Default Action Pattern

Gurus,

Was there a resolution on this issue ?

rgds,
Ram

On 11/8/06, Ramkumar Menon <ramkumar.menon@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Gurus,
>
> In the case of a WSDL 2.0 interface inheriting another interface, what wd
> be the Default Action pattern for Faults that were inherited from the parent
> interface ? Would it be still containing the targetNamespace of the parent
> interface [the declaring interface], and the name of the target interface,
> or would it be composed from the targetnamespace and the interface name of
> the child interface ?
>
> The semantics for this is Not clear in the document that describes the
> WSDL 2.0 Binding for WS-Addressing.
>
> -Ram
>



-- 
Shift to the left, shift to the right!
Pop up, push down, byte, byte, byte!

-Ramkumar Menon
A typical Macroprocessor