W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ws-addressing@w3.org > November 2006

Re: Issue: Default Action Pattern

From: Ramkumar Menon <ramkumar.menon@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 26 Nov 2006 18:50:28 -0800
Message-ID: <22bb8a4e0611261850j3d35f0dcuf43f9044d991ecdd@mail.gmail.com>
To: public-ws-addressing@w3.org

Was there a resolution on this issue ?


On 11/8/06, Ramkumar Menon <ramkumar.menon@gmail.com> wrote:
> Gurus,
> In the case of a WSDL 2.0 interface inheriting another interface, what wd
> be the Default Action pattern for Faults that were inherited from the parent
> interface ? Would it be still containing the targetNamespace of the parent
> interface [the declaring interface], and the name of the target interface,
> or would it be composed from the targetnamespace and the interface name of
> the child interface ?
> The semantics for this is Not clear in the document that describes the
> WSDL 2.0 Binding for WS-Addressing.
> -Ram

Shift to the left, shift to the right!
Pop up, push down, byte, byte, byte!

-Ramkumar Menon
A typical Macroprocessor
Received on Monday, 27 November 2006 03:16:31 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 2 June 2009 18:35:15 GMT