Good afternoon all, If I'm bringing this issue up too early and we need to make more progress with the policy assertions, then lets have the discussion later but I wanted to bring up the possibility of keeping the current namespace for interoperability reasons - There are a number of shipped implementations which support at least a subset of the current namespace that I'd like to keep interoperability with them (and the WSDL they generate/understand). Given that the Anonymous element is not widely implemented and we are keeping the remainder of the specification, I propose retaining the 2006/05 namespace for those elements and adding a new namespace for the new, policy-specific bits, all within the same document. How does this sound as an option? David David Illsley Web Services Development MP211, IBM Hursley Park, SO21 2JN +44 (0)1962 815049 (Int. 245049) david.illsley@uk.ibm.comReceived on Sunday, 26 November 2006 16:42:52 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 2 June 2009 18:35:15 GMT