W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ws-addressing@w3.org > March 2006

Re: ISSUE: Where do faults go?

From: David Hull <dmh@tibco.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Mar 2006 15:48:26 -0500
To: Hugo Haas <hugo@w3.org>
Cc: David Orchard <dorchard@bea.com>, Christopher B Ferris <chrisfer@us.ibm.com>, Glen Daniels <gdaniels@sonicsoftware.com>, public-ws-addressing@w3.org
Message-id: <4415DA9A.9010302@tibco.com>
Just to clarify, this test gives wsa:FaultTo = none, but expects the mU
fault to come back as a response.  This is consistent with mU faults
preventing WSA from being engaged.  Normal behavior without WSA engaged
would be for the fault to come back as a response.  If WSA had instead
been engaged, the fault would have been dropped.

In other words, the test is consistent with the spec as it stands now. 
Is that correct?

Hugo Haas wrote:

>* David Orchard <dorchard@bea.com> [2006-03-13 12:08-0800]
>  
>
>>I agree with what I think are Chris/Dave's position, that WS-A info MUST
>>not be used for formulating MAPs when an mU fault is generated.
>>
>>Said differently, the WS-A header blocks are not treated differently
>>than other header blocks.
>>
>>To do otherwise would be potentially dangerous.  
>>    
>>
>
>Note that we have a test for this scenario in our test suite:
>
>    http://www.w3.org/2002/ws/addr/testsuite/testcases/#test1238
>
>Cheers,
>
>Hugo
>
>  
>
Received on Monday, 13 March 2006 20:48:56 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 2 June 2009 18:35:12 GMT