W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ws-addressing@w3.org > March 2006

RE: SOAP 1.1 request-optional-response http binding

From: David Orchard <dorchard@bea.com>
Date: Thu, 2 Mar 2006 07:22:45 -0800
Message-ID: <E16EB59B8AEDF445B644617E3C1B3C9CF6FA8B@repbex01.amer.bea.com>
To: "Richard Salz" <rsalz@us.ibm.com>, "Mark Baker" <distobj@acm.org>
Cc: <public-ws-addressing@w3.org>, <public-ws-addressing-request@w3.org>

How can you "know"?  202 says you can't know.  

And how can you preclude the response being "the" soap response?  We are
dealing with soap 1.1 which has no sense of MEPs.  All we can talk about
in a SOAP binding is the constructs that soap 1.1 gives us.  

WS-A goes on top and says if you are doing request-response using
non-anonymous aka 2 different http connections, then the response must
be on a separate http connection.  I think that is the right layering of
dealing with "responses".  

>From the very latest ws-a soap binding spec:
When "http://www.w3.org/2005/08/addressing/anonymous" is not specified
for the response endpoint, then the message SHOULD be part of a binding
that supports not returning a SOAP envelope in the HTTP response. Any
response message SHOULD be sent using a separate connection and using
the address value specified by response endpoint.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Richard Salz [mailto:rsalz@us.ibm.com]
> Sent: Thursday, March 02, 2006 4:05 PM
> To: Mark Baker
> Cc: David Orchard; public-ws-addressing@w3.org; public-ws-addressing-
> request@w3.org
> Subject: Re: SOAP 1.1 request-optional-response http binding
> I agree with Mark.  I need to know deterministically if the response-
> is "the" SOAP message or not.  MAY is definitely the wrong thing here.
>         /r$
> --
> SOA Appliance Group
> IBM Application Integration Middleware

Notice:  This email message, together with any attachments, may contain
information  of  BEA Systems,  Inc.,  its subsidiaries  and  affiliated
entities,  that may be confidential,  proprietary,  copyrighted  and/or
legally privileged, and is intended solely for the use of the individual
or entity named in this message. If you are not the intended recipient,
and have received this message in error, please immediately return this
by email and then delete it.
Received on Thursday, 2 March 2006 15:24:33 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 21:04:13 UTC