W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ws-addressing@w3.org > January 2006

RE: SOAP 1.1 One-way HTTP Binding doc

From: Christopher B Ferris <chrisfer@us.ibm.com>
Date: Fri, 20 Jan 2006 14:17:03 -0500
To: "David Orchard" <dorchard@bea.com>
Cc: "WS-Addressing" <public-ws-addressing@w3.org>
Message-ID: <OF64679ED7.F0F63E75-ON852570FC.0069AD72-852570FC.0069ED89@us.ibm.com>
How does one distinguish between this binding and the current SOAP11 HTTP 
binding from
the perspective of the receiving node?

Cheers,

Christopher Ferris
STSM, Emerging e-business Industry Architecture
email: chrisfer@us.ibm.com
blog: http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/blogs/dw_blog.jspa?blog=440
phone: +1 508 377 9295

"David Orchard" <dorchard@bea.com> wrote on 01/20/2006 01:40:07 PM:

> If you're returning a soap envelope in an HTTP response, by 
> definition you're not using a one-way binding. 
> 
> This doesn't affect the MEP in play because there is no MEP with soap 
1.1. 
> 
> Dave
> 
> 
> From: Christopher B Ferris [mailto:chrisfer@us.ibm.com] 
> Sent: Friday, January 20, 2006 10:34 AM
> To: David Orchard
> Cc: WS-Addressing; public-ws-addressing-request@w3.org
> Subject: Re: SOAP 1.1 One-way HTTP Binding doc
> 
> 
> <decloak> 
> 
> Dave, 
> 
> I have *significant* heartburn with this as it precludes the use 
> case of sending a 
> WS-RM SequenceAcknowledgement (or other infrastructure-level signal) as 
a 
> SOAP envelope in the HTTP response. 
> 
> The use case is considered to be of critical importance to a number 
> of customers 
> with which I have dealt who want to leverage WS-RM for both oneway and 
asynch
> request response message flows between business partners. 
> 
> This proposed binding simply carries forward the mistake that the WS-I 
BP 1.x
> made with R2714 and R2750 (which I argued against at the time). 
> 
> I've got another post still in draft responding to another thread on
> this matter 
> that I will be sending shortly. 
> 
> </decloak> 
> 
> Cheers, 
> 
> Christopher Ferris
> STSM, Emerging e-business Industry Architecture
> email: chrisfer@us.ibm.com
> blog: http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/blogs/dw_blog.jspa?blog=440
> phone: +1 508 377 9295 
> 
> public-ws-addressing-request@w3.org wrote on 01/20/2006 01:09:47 PM:
> 
> > Here's an xml spec xml and html version of a one-way HTTP Binding. 
> > 
> > Cheers, 
> > Dave[attachment "soap11onewayhttpbinding.xml" deleted by Christopher
> > B Ferris/Waltham/IBM] [attachment "soap11onewayhttpbinding.html" 
> > deleted by Christopher B Ferris/Waltham/IBM] 
Received on Friday, 20 January 2006 19:17:19 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 2 June 2009 18:35:11 GMT