W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ws-addressing@w3.org > February 2006

Re: Clarification for WS-RX

From: Christopher B Ferris <chrisfer@us.ibm.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2006 15:15:12 -0500
To: Christopher B Ferris <chrisfer@us.ibm.com>
Cc: David Hull <dmh@tibco.com>, "public-ws-addressing@w3.org" <public-ws-addressing@w3.org>, public-ws-addressing-request@w3.org
Message-ID: <OFD0D106BE.5408CEC6-ON8525711C.006ED83E-8525711C.006F407D@us.ibm.com>
Slight clarification... the constraint would only apply when [reply to] is 
anonymous.

Cheers,

Christopher Ferris
STSM, Emerging e-business Industry Architecture
email: chrisfer@us.ibm.com
blog: http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/blogs/dw_blog.jspa?blog=440
phone: +1 508 377 9295

public-ws-addressing-request@w3.org wrote on 02/21/2006 02:44:47 PM:

> 
> Probably broken. 
> 
> I am in the process of submitting an issue to the WS-RX TC about 
> that. IMO, it probably needs to be (at least in the HTTP case) 
> a non-anon URI EPR in the CSR/Accept/AcksTo. 
> 
> Cheers, 
> 
> Christopher Ferris
> STSM, Emerging e-business Industry Architecture
> email: chrisfer@us.ibm.com
> blog: http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/blogs/dw_blog.jspa?blog=440
> phone: +1 508 377 9295 
> 
> public-ws-addressing-request@w3.org wrote on 02/21/2006 01:59:37 PM:
> 
> > 
> > I'm a bit loath to send this to the whole WS-RX list, and I think 
there
> > are enough WS-RXperts here to answer, so ...
> > 
> > Suppose I use an ordinary request-response, with anonymous [reply
> > endpoint], to create a sequence.  In that request, I wsrm:Offer to
> > create a sequence the other way.  The receiver of the request responds
> > with wsrm:Accept.  This has wsrm:AcksTo anonymous.
> > 
> > What happens?
> > 
> > 
Received on Tuesday, 21 February 2006 20:15:54 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 2 June 2009 18:35:11 GMT