Re: CR20 proposal

On 2/12/06, Francisco Curbera <curbera@us.ibm.com> wrote:
>
> As I said in my earlier mail, this would be the text to include in section
> 3.5:
>
> "When the HTTP transport is in use, the anonymous URI is only used to
> indicate the use of the HTTP reply channel so it can only appear as the
> value of the [destination] property in reply messages."

Is that normative?

Mark.