W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ws-addressing@w3.org > February 2006

Re: CR20 proposal

From: Mark Baker <distobj@acm.org>
Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2006 10:26:26 -0500
Message-ID: <c70bc85d0602130726g7085ec74k963211b84c0a101a@mail.gmail.com>
To: Francisco Curbera <curbera@us.ibm.com>
Cc: public-ws-addressing@w3.org

On 2/12/06, Francisco Curbera <curbera@us.ibm.com> wrote:
> As I said in my earlier mail, this would be the text to include in section
> 3.5:
> "When the HTTP transport is in use, the anonymous URI is only used to
> indicate the use of the HTTP reply channel so it can only appear as the
> value of the [destination] property in reply messages."

Is that normative?

Received on Monday, 13 February 2006 15:26:38 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 2 June 2009 18:35:11 GMT