W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ws-addressing@w3.org > February 2006

Re: WSA From

From: Paul Fremantle <pzfreo@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 9 Feb 2006 09:58:10 +0000
Message-ID: <88f5d710602090158n4f5952d7ud01eacfa7fb6ad67@mail.gmail.com>
To: tom@coastin.com
Cc: "Conor P. Cahill" <ConCahill@aol.com>, Mark Little <mark.little@jboss.com>, "Cahill, Conor P" <conor.p.cahill@intel.com>, public-ws-addressing@w3.org
Tom

+1. I think its more useful as an EPR. For example, I can imagine putting
some SLA related info in the From extensibility points.


Paul

On 2/8/06, Tom Rutt <tom@coastin.com> wrote:
>
> Conor P. Cahill wrote:
>
> >
> >
> >
> >
> I would prefer that we keep the syntax for this "will hardly ever be
> used" feature to be retained as in the CR (namely an EPR).
>
> Making the syntax "simpler" would take away some of the "hardly ever
> used" uses people might make of wsa:from.
>
> Tom Rutt
>
> >>If it's optional, why not have it as a full-blown EPR anyway?
> >>To be honest, I'd also be happy with something rather than
> >>nothing, but I'd be interested in knowing reasons for URI
> >>rather than EPR.
> >>
> >>
> >
> >EPRs are generally used when I intend to dereference them to]
> >communicate with another party.   At this point there's no
> >processing rules that I would use to make use of expanded
> >fields in an EPR.
> >
> >Of course, <From> could have xs:anyAttribute and an
> >xs:any sub-element definition so that in your particular
> >environment anything could be added.  Just that the basic
> >model from From is identifiying the other party -- which
> >seems to be what I've heard here.
> >
> >Conor
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> ----------------------------------------------------
> Tom Rutt        email: tom@coastin.com; trutt@us.fujitsu.com
> Tel: +1 732 801 5744          Fax: +1 732 774 5133
>
>
>


--
Paul Fremantle
VP/Technology, WSO2 and OASIS WS-RX TC Co-chair

http://bloglines.com/blog/paulfremantle
paul@wso2.com

"Oxygenating the Web Service Platform", www.wso2.com
Received on Thursday, 9 February 2006 09:58:30 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 2 June 2009 18:35:11 GMT