W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-ws-addressing@w3.org > February 2006

Re: Clarification on MessageId

From: Eran Chinthaka <chinthaka@wso2.com>
Date: Wed, 08 Feb 2006 11:24:47 +0600
Message-ID: <43E9809F.4090203@wso2.com>
To: public-ws-addressing@w3.org
Sorry, It was a typo. Anyway, thanks all for helping me to sort this out.

-- Eran Chinthaka

Davanum Srinivas wrote:

> Hehehe, yes, that was a typo.
>
> http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=axis-dev&m=113825268327180&w=2
>
> thanks,
> dims
>
> Prasad Yendluri wrote:
>
> >True. BTW, the scheme and namespace must occur in that order  like
> >_urn:uuid:<aUniqueNumber>_
> >Eran's note shows them reversed  "_uuid:urn:<aUniqueNumber>_". I hope
> >that was a typo.
>
>
> >Christopher B Ferris wrote:
>
> >>Exactly,
> >>
> >>You need to use both prefixes. One is the scheme (urn:) and the other
> >>is the
> >>urn: namespace id (uuid)
> >>
> >>Cheers,
> >>
> >>Christopher Ferris
> >>STSM, Emerging e-business Industry Architecture
> >>email: chrisfer@us.ibm.com
> >>blog: http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/blogs/dw_blog.jspa?blog=440
> >>phone: +1 508 377 9295
> >>
> >>public-ws-addressing-request@w3.org wrote on 02/07/2006 02:12:53 AM:
> >>
> >>>
> >>>>I would have thought that one might use EITHER uuid: OR urn: as a
> >>>>prefix to the message id - using both seems a little excessive.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>Perhaps one of our MS representatives might care to comment?
> >>>
> >>>or prehaps anyone with the wits to read RFC4122 ;-)
> >>>
> >>>http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc4122.txt
> >>>
> >>>Paul
> >>>
>
>
> --
> Davanum Srinivas (dims@wso2.com)
> VP/Engg, WSO2 (http://wso2.com)
> Yahoo IM: dims Cell/Mobile: +1 (508) 415 7509


Received on Wednesday, 8 February 2006 05:24:59 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 2 June 2009 18:35:11 GMT